Dan Skolnik addresses West End News claims

(Cross-posted at Augusta Insider)

A few weeks ago, the Portland Public Safety Committee gave Portland Police the OK to use tasers for a trial period. Prior to the agreement, several Maine groups including Peace Action Maine and the Maine Civil Liberties Union, spoke out against the use of tasers by the Portland PD. Councilman Dan Skolnik wrote an Op/Ed in the Portland Press Herald on June 27th attempting to alleviate some concerns over police taser use. One Portlander did not agree with Councilman Skolnik’s views.

Marge Niblock, police reporter for the West End News, wrote an rebuttal to Councilman Skolnik’s editorial in the Portland Press Herald and the West End News. Niblock questioned Councilman Skolnik’s facts on tasers, specifically the banning of tasers in Baltimore, Chicago, and Philidelphia and Councilman Skolnik’s citing of a taser manufacturer’s website as a resource for how “police technology is regulated at the municipal level all over the country.” Niblock accused Councilman Skolnik and the Portland Press Herald of “promulgating misinformation

Niblock also reported that Councilman Skolnik told her “My statement is not false. It’s not sufficiently accurate.” in response to his inaccuracies in the PPH editorial. “(Skolnik’s
clarification brings to mind President Bill Clinton’s famous disclaimer: “I did not have sex with that woman.”)” Niblock wrote in reply.

The West End News reported last week that Councilman Skolnik “called the writer of the story at her home after the story appeared, screaming at her and calling her a liar. He also
called the newspaper in a rage, claiming that his words had been distorted.” Niblock also said she had taken a polygraph test confirming her side of the story.

We have the West End News’ side of the story, but what about Councilman Skolnik. Councilman Skolnik has provided a statement clarifying his side of the incident. The statement appears below in full.

When Marge Niblock called me and brought the error to my attention I went back to the source material and looked again. I told her, “You’re right I made a mistake. I was looking at the wrong information in the source material. Of course, the statement isn’t false, because tasers ARE prohibited for civilians. But, yes, it’s not sufficiently accurate because that’s not what we’re talking about; we’re talking about police use.”

Niblock distorted that statement into her headline, “My statement wasn’t false, it wasn’t sufficiently accurate.” She purposefully and knowingly made it look like I TRIED to mislead people with the misstatement, AND that I didn’t acknowledge the error when pointed out in that phone call. Both implications are as false as can be, and Niblock knows that.

This little bit of invention was apparently done so Niblock could make a witticism about Bill Clinton and me, rather than advance the public discourse on taser use by the Portland Police Dept. But Clinton’s statement was videotaped.

Are we to be impressed that Niblock claims to have passed a polygraph test? They are unreliable, and in any case it shows she cannot produce any RECORD that I said what she printed. That’s because her gross distortion is either an irresponsible or an incompetent fiction.

Ed King is also inflamed over this because I called Niblock on the carpet, although he is unable to come up with a cogent reason why. His ideas about the role of the press in local politics are unique among the Portland press corps. Ed’s notions of honesty and fairness evidently do not match mine

.

Another developer hightails it from Portland’s waterfront

The Portland Forecaster reports that Eric Cianchette, owner of the Portland Regency, will not be pursuing a building project on the Maine Wharf at this time. The Maine Wharf, which is roughly behind the Dry Dock Restuarant, would have been home to a 120 room hotel, with the first floor dedicated to marine dependent business. Along with the $45 million hotel, Cianchette planned to reconstruct the aging pier for roughly $10 million.

Cianchette’s lawyer cited upcoming amendments proposed by property owners in the Waterfront Central Zone as his reason for not continuing with the project at this time. Cianchette is taking a wait and see approach for now.

Baystock Festival w/ GUSTER

In a few weeks the Baystock Music Festival will be back at the Maine State Pier. On August 8th, Baystock returns with an evening of great music. This year Baystock will feature local favorites Jason Spooner, Cindy Bullens, and Gypsy Tailwind. Guster comes back to Maine to headline the event. Proceeds from the event will go to the Jessie Fund which helps to support children with cancer and the Maine Children’s Cancer Program. See some great bands, drink beer outside, all for a good cause. What more can you ask for?

More from I Love Portland:

The Maine State Pier will be the place to be on August 8th, as the Baystock Music Festival brings you an evening of great music.

The 6th Annual event supporting local charities in Portland, Maine, will open its doors at 4pm, and will kick things off at 6pm with the works of The Jason Spooner Trio, voted “Best Folk Act” by the Portland Phoenix two years in a row. At 7pm, you will enjoy the sounds of two-time Grammy nominated Cindy Bullens, who was once a backup singer to Elton John. Following at 8pm, Gypsy Tailwind will dazzle the crowd with their unique sound influenced by rock, folk, and country, before free-spirited and humorous Guster takes the stage at 9pm. You never know what to expect other than a great time when Guster performs, so this show will be a treat.

Even better, proceeds from the event will go to The Jessie Fund, a public charity dedicated to supporting children with cancer, who’s primary beneficiary is the Maine Children’s Cancer Program. The Jessie Fund ensures that children diagnosed with cancer receive the best care possible regardless of their families ability to pay, they provide counseling and support for those patients and families in need, and support research of treating childhood cancers.

Thanks to local sponsors, radio station WCLZ 98.9, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, The Dogfish Company, and Maine Hosting Solutions for helping such a great event return to Portland for fans to enjoy for another year.

The show is General Admission and open to all ages. Food and drinks will be available, and a Beer Garden will be open for guests 21 years of age and older.

You can purchase your tickets at all Bull Moose Music store locations or online here at Brown Paper Tickets.com. Tickets are $25 each in advance of the show or $35 each the day of the show. Get your tickets now!! Enjoy the show!

Show schedule:
4pm – Doors open
6pm – The Jason Spooner Trio – www.JasonSpooner.com
7pm – Cindy Bullens – www.CindyBullens.com
8pm – Gypsy Tailwind – GypsyTailwind.net
9pm – Guster – www.Guster.com

Portland’s Old Port crazier than LA

Portland’s Police Chief James Craig has surely seen a lot in his 28 year career as a police officer. Craig spent those years as an officer in the LAPD. Craig said in the area he worked in “that it was not uncommon to see a homicide once or twice a month, a drive-by shooting once a week or twice a week.”

That being said, I find it pretty amazing that Chief Craig would then say that he’d “never seen anything like [the Old Port on Saturday night]” Is it really that bad? I’ve seen my fair share of brawls and vomiting in the streets, but is it worse than drug pushers and gang bangers?

Chief Craig did visit the OP during it’s high season. Head down Fore St. on a chilly January and it’s pretty tame, no worse than any other congregation of drinking establishments. Chief Craig did comment that the cause of the “shocking” Old Port night scene was patrons being over-served. Since many of the bars make enough during the summer to make up for the lean winter months, it should be obvious that people are being over-served. Is there any way to regulate this? Without stepping across some pretty serious civil liberties lines it isn’t. Something tells me Mainers wont put up with the kind of bologna you have to go through to get a drink in Utah.

If people hitting the booze too hard is the problem is there an easy solution? No. Someone’s pocket will take a hit, be it taxpayers for new methods of regulating or more cops to patrol the Old Port bars or bar owners losing out on the income. Look, we all know the place can be a mess during the summer. Puke, sweat, spilled drinks, fights, break ups to make ups, you can see it all in Portland’s Old Port. Sure it’s can be a pain in the ass, but those of us that know it love it. Let’s just leave those disgusting hooch alleys alone.

Visions of the City Beautiful – The Portland Maine Park System in the Gilded Age

The park movement of the Gilded Ages sprung from many influences. The goals of businessmen, politicians, reformers, and the working class melded to lead to the creation many of the nation’s famous parks. The public has long held the parks of Portland Maine in high regard. Visitors have come to enjoy the tree lined streets, picturesque promenades, and sylvan parklands of the city for generations. What were the motives driving Portland mayor and philanthropist James P Baxter’s push to form the park system we recognize today?

Portland’s park system literally began from the ashes of the Great Fire of 1866. No formal parks existed before the Great Fire. The Evergreen Cemetery was the closest thing Portland had to a park. The Portland City Council purchased an area of burnt land, now bordered by Pearl, Franklin, Market, and Federal Sts. James P. Baxter called this purchase, “…one of the best exhibitions of wise enterprise which Portland has ever made.”

The park provided the city with a fresh green space at a time when Longfellow compared the devastated Portland to Pompeii. Originally christened Phoenix Park, After Abraham Lincoln’s assassination, Portland changed the name to Lincoln Park. Lincoln Park provided a place for a stroll and a fountain for children to splash in. That was not the parks only purpose. To prevent another sweeping firestorm, like the one experience during the Great Fire, the city needed fire barriers. Lincoln Park would slow a fire moving through the city, hopefully giving the newly established fire department time to stop the flames. The park also helped “promote the public health” , a justification Baxter will employ later in his push for an extensive park system.

James Phinney Baxter moved to Portland at the age of 10. The son of a doctor, Baxter traveled to Boston to study law. After returning to Portland, Baxter became involved in a canning business, the Portland Packing Company. The Portland Packing Company turned out nearly two million cans of corn yearly. The wealth the business generated for Baxter propelled him into Portland’s high society. Baxter held the office of mayor in Portland from 1893-96 and again from 1904-05.

Before becoming mayor, Baxter spent time traveling in Europe. There he visited many grand parks in France, Austria, and other influential European countries. These European parks influenced Baxter, as they had impacted many others of his time. Landscape architect Andrew Jackson Downing had written that despite their political differences, “the French and Germans seemed greater practical “republicans” than Americans because their cities had parks and gardens “provided at public cost, maintained at public expense, and enjoyed daily and hourly by all persons of class.”

Frederick Law Olmsted, whom Baxter would later employ, spoke highly of the municipal park movement. Olmsted stated the park movement of the United States was, “spontaneously engendered by the ‘Genius of Civilization’”. His creations would come to include the park system of Buffalo New York, Milwaukee Wisconsin, and Boston’s Emerald Necklace. Baxter toured the Emerald Necklace after it’s completion. Olmsted’s plan had taken old dilapidated buildings, demolished them, and turned the lands into parks. Baxter wished Portland to follow Boston’s lead. Baxter incorporated European aesthetics and emerging cosmopolitan views into his vision of the “City Beautiful”.

The City Beautiful combined elements of culture, economics, and strong city management to achieve a cosmopolitan sophistication. According to Baxter, the values held encompassed by the City Beautiful directly influenced a city’s prosperity. To reach the goal of City Beautiful, a city needed to acquire and maintain certain elements. The City Beautiful should contain “beautiful mansions with well kept grounds, public buildings of architectural importance, art galleries, statues, fountains, public squares and gardens, parkways, playgrounds, and parks.” Baxter would go on to claim “no city with any claim to enterprise is worthy of existence which does not provide its inhabitants with generous park privileges.”

Influential Portlanders had claimed parks were a wicked extravagance. Baxter countered that the parks were well worth the cost. Increases they brought in property value would help to ease tax issues for the public. Baxter also advocated the park’s benefits to Portland’s poor.

Nor are parks now built for rich alone…but also for the poor, who are confined a large portion of their lives within narrow limits, and to whom an opportunity…to breathe pure air and enjoy the beauty of green lawns…is a boon of incalculable value.”

Baxter’s view was common. Americans widely accepted that cities of the time were noisy, crowded and dirty. Parks gave city dwellers a place to escape all that and return to nature. A physician noted in 1869 that, “apart from considerations of sanitary economy public parks may be regarded as an unerring index in the advance of a people in civilization and refinement.”

When Baxter took the mayor’s office in 1893, he began to implement a vast expansion of Portland’s park system. The Deering family left much a great deal of land to the city in 1879. The city had christened the area Deering Oaks Park. Yet the city did little to improve the forested area. The mayor at the time, William Senter, had seen no need to do more than maintain the existing park.

The name ‘the Oaks’ or ‘Deering Oaks’ for this public breathing place seems to have become well established. It is scarcely ever termed the ‘Park’, and is a name so much fitter and better than the latter that special care should be taken to retain it. The place can probably never become a park with expensive park-like structures and accessories, but will always be ‘the Oaks’ whatever may be done about it.

Baxter, who had played in the Deering woods as a youth, encouraged landscaping of the park and surrounding streets. The city would make Park Ave., then called Portland St., bordering Deering Oaks wider and more beautiful. Baxter felt “wide streets and spacious parks [projected] an image of a wide-awake progressive growing city”. Visitors entered Portland by way of Park Ave. Beautifying this area would “attract urbane new residents” and in turn further Baxter’s goal of turning Portland cosmopolitan. Portland’s Park Commissioner at the time, Alanzo Smith stated owners of “handsome equipages” would appreciate the Park Ave expansion. Widening the street would also give real estate a “tremendous boom”. Baxter owned a home on Park Ave.

Portland’s middle and working class citizens were less than pleased. Fore St. badly needed repairs at the time. Citizens petitioned that the money spent on Park Ave. go instead to Fore St. Baxter ignored their calls. Some began to wonder how far would Baxter go to transform Portland into the “City Beautiful”. The park system Baxter envisioned would test how far the public’s limits.

The city owned much of the land that now comprises the Western and Eastern Promenades of Portland before Baxter’s term as mayor. When Baxter took office he set out to acquire the rest. Baxter was concerned that developers would buy up land on the northwestern slope of Bramhall Hill leading up to the Western Promenade. Baxter worried these developers would build “cheap structures” on the hill, ruining the Western Promenade’s aesthetic view.

Who would live in these “cheap structures” that Baxter disliked? Working class families would. The elite of the city had staked their claims on the areas immediately bordering the two Promenades and Deering Oaks. The working class did not fit with Baxter’s vision of Portland. The City Beautiful was an aesthetically pleasing commercial and residential one. Dirty manufacturing ruined the beauty of the city, as did the people who worked in those factories.

What can be derived from an ignorant foreign population, which every manufacturing city attracts to it? The perils which such a population brings to a community are seen every day in the columns of our newspapers, which depict in lurid terms the anarchy, strife and bloodshed…which result from gathering together large numbers of ignorant men…in towns where manufacturing enterprises predominate.

Baxter wanted to attract wealthy, cosmopolitans to Portland. Unrefined lower class workers would encourage the wealthy to find another haven. To keep the necessary workers in check Baxter used the parks to placate them. In his 1895-96 Mayoral Address, Baxter called the public grounds “property of the people”. Even the poorest of Portlanders could enjoy the feeling of ownership.

The Parks system had another use as well. Tourists regarded Portland as one of the great summer destinations during the late 19th – early 20th century. A beautiful city attracts more visitors. More visitors meant more money. This too motivated Baxter’s push for a citywide park system.

Currents in city planning had influenced Baxter’s park system plan. Planners had begun to imagine wide boulevards and belt parkways connecting parks throughout cities. Boston and Chicago “furnished striking examples” of this new approach to city planning. The new park systems did not “superimpose one oasis of beauty on a big city aimed at changing the aspect of its entire life.”

The park system would contain Portland’s principle parks, Deering Oaks and the two Promenades. A newspaper editorial said the new park system would “attract summer visitors who would go away and advertise the place and return with their friends to leave money with [Portland’s] railroads, hotels, and tradesmen”.

A series of tree-lined parkways would connect the parks. The parkway would run from the Western Promenade down Bramhall Hill to Cumberland Ave. From there the parkway continued down High St to Deering Oaks. To connect Deering Oaks to the Eastern Promenade Baxter proposed a grand boulevard around the Back Cove. The Back Cove at the time was an “illodered spot” “dangerous to the public health”. Low tide exposed odorous tidal flats as well as the city’s sewage, which emptied there. Baxter wanted to change that. The city would transform the road around the Back Cove to be included in Baxter’s new park system. A wide elegantly designed boulevard lined with parkland would wrap around the Back Cove. The city would dam the mouth of the Cove to “preserve the water depth”. Baxter envisioned the Back Cove teaming with sailing yachts and steam launches. After the work on the Back Cove was finished Portland would have “the finest sheet of water for regattas and other marine sports.”

The City of Portland could not afford to purchase the land for the proposed boulevard. Baxter convinced landowners around the Back Cove to give the land needed for the project to the City. Baxter knew these rich landowners were concerned Baxter’s building projects would raise their taxes. The boulevard would increase the property values in the area. The increased property value would lower tax rates. The high ground surrounding the Back Cove would become prime real estate.

Middle and working class voters however had had enough. Baxter had not respected the interests of the working class majority in Portland. Many felt he was pursuing these city improvements for his own benefit and the benefit of the Portland elite. Their suspicions were not unfounded. Only the rich could afford a carriage to ride along the new parkway system. The working class did not have the leisure time to enjoy such a long drive. Baxter had begun to lose the true egalitarian spirit of the park movement: “[to] meet the numerous interests of the neighboring community rather than to fulfill in the highest measure any single want of the whole city.”

The citizens voted Baxter out of office in 1897, but voters have short memories and Baxter had deep pockets. Still, the election was hard fought. Baxter’s opponent Nathan Clifford wielded a great deal of his own political power. Clifford had been United States Attorney General under President James K. Polk and President James Buchanan appointed him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. The Portland Socialist Party trusted neither candidate. Clifford, they felt, exemplified the “Wall Street Wing”, while Baxter represented an “obstructionist to municipal progress”. The Socialists highlighted the true costs of Baxter’s civic projects. “In place of fuel at cost”, said the Socialist Party, “[Baxter] gives us ornamental grass plots; in the place of water at cost, a visionary boulevard.” Despite the challenge of the opposition, Baxter rallied his political influence. Voters reelected him in 1904.

The Portland City Council put the Back Cove project on hold in Baxter’s absence. Anyone hoping that Baxter abandoned the undertaking had their hopes dashed. Baxter resumed work on the Back Cove Boulevard immediately upon returning to office. In his 1904 Mayoral Address, Baxter attempted to ease the fears of the high costs associated with his parkway system.

Nothing adorns a city so much as well kept esplanades. They are permanent additions to a street, and with half their cost paid by the abutters the City can well afford to encourage their construction.

This time Baxter would draw from his own funds to raise interest in his parkway system. Baxter paid for the entire City Council to travel to Boston to view its “unsurpassed” park system.

When the election of 1905 came Clifford was ready. Clifford called Baxter on his claim that the parkway system would lower taxes. Clifford claimed this work to “increase property values for the rich” left “wretched streets and sidewalks for the poor.” The Portland Argus called the vote between Clifford and Baxter a choice “between the prose of good streets and the poetry of the Boulevard” respectively. Clifford won the election. Clifford halted work on the Back Cove Boulevard indefinitely along with the parkway system.

I do not believe that the interests of the city, or the wishes of a majority of the citizens thereof, warrant a further extension of work on the boulevard until, at least, the sidewalks and streets of the city are kept clean and put in proper condition

Clifford felt the City’s money would be better spent in keep its streets clean and maintained. Unkempt streets would create a bad impression on visitors. Dirty streets reflect on the city’s administration. Visitors would not want to return to live in a dirty mismanaged city.

Baxter used the spirit of reform for his own ends. Baxter was not a reformer, but a petty politician. Baxter pushed the building of the Portland Park system to further his own goals. Baxter wished to raise real-estate prices on land he and other wealthy Portlanders owned. Gunther Barth states cities created parks during the Gilded Age to “meet the numerous interests of the neighboring community rather than to fulfill in the highest measure any single want of the whole city.” Baxter however intended Portland Parks to attract the wealthy to Portland and keep the city free of what he saw as unsavory lower class elements.

James Phinney Baxter’s legacy is still with Portland. From the boulevard renamed in his honor to Portland’s cherished green spaces, Portlander’s can still feel Baxter’s influence in the “Forest City”. The lesson of Baxter’s grand park system plan should not be forgotten. Baxter forged his park system at the expense of other city planning needs. Baxter alienated the middle and working classes of Portland who could have been his greatest supporters. To survive a city needs balance. That is how a city truly becomes the “City Beautiful”.

Shouts of the Masses – The Shaping of Portland High School

New England has prided itself on its progressive view of education. Boston Massachusetts created the first public boys high school in 1821. Portland Maine soon followed suit in the same year. Since its beginnings in 1821, the Portland Public Education System has struggled with the competing interests of the townsfolk and society. The Portland School Board spent many years debating the merits of a public education curriculum meant for college bound students in an industrializing society. Also deliberated was the issue of allowing girls entrance into the public education system. When it came to public education in the 19th century, the wants of the community did not always coincide with the needs of society.

The education of boys in Portland began in earnest in 1821. A Latin school was constructed on Exchange St. The Latin School curriculum, which was considered a classical education, consisted of the following:

Latin: Grammar; Caesar, Books I-IV; Virgil, Books I-IV, and Eclogues; Ovid, 3,000 lines; Cicero, Seven orations, and Latin Compositions.
Greek: Grammar; Lessons; Anabasis, Books I-IV; Iliad, Books I-III; and Greek Composition.
Mathematics: Algebra, through equations of the second degree; Geometry, Plane; Arithmetic reviewed.
History: Same as regular course, except Modern History.
Geography: Ancient and Modern.
English: Same as regular course.
French: One year of regular, course for those pupils who intend to enter all colleges except Bowdoin.
Sciences: Such of those studies in the regular course as are required for college

Throughout the state during the 1820s, many public schools, including elementary and high schools were built. A tax of 40 cents per inhabitant was levied to pay for the cost.

The general populace was glad to have the Portland boys off the streets. Before the schools arrived, the boys had nothing to occupy their time. Gangs were formed and violence ensued. “The town, from Munjoy’s Hill to State Street, was the scene of constant hostilities” It was not unknown for gangs of boys to battle with stones and bats. The schools brought an element of discipline to the town. School encouraged the boys to strive to better themselves and behave. The schools were so successful at taming the feral boys of Portland that Edward Elwell claimed the actions and attitudes of early Portland’s boys would, “not be tolerated in present day” and that “Portland can boast no city has better behaved youth.” Certainly, the populace was glad to support the school with results like these, knowing that a few extra cents would keep the children off the streets and out of trouble.

Sending the boys off to school was beneficial to the citizens of Portland. Those planning on attending higher learning were more than adequately prepared to meet the standards of the time. This type of classical education previously was not for every student. Though it was perfectly acceptable for a boy planning to attend college to be studying ancient Greek and Latin, this type of education was hardly applicable to those whom would not seek higher education . The Portland School board in its 1863 report recognized the problem. Stubbornly they chose to do nothing to remedy this. Instead, they lay the blame on apathetic children and shortsighted parents.

Young boys leave school not because High School does not prepare them for practical life, but because they wish to try this life without preparing for it…The time and labor of school culture are begrudged-the value of thorough mental training, as the best preparation for a practical career, is not known, or not rightly estimated. The faculty which a child may have to earn money in early life, is thought more important than his faculty of becoming, by education, a well-trained man, equal to all duties of the highest positions in his maturer years.

The transformation from an agrarian economy to an industrial one was greatly accelerated after the Civil War. Fueled by immigrant labor and new technological breakthroughs, America was quickly becoming an industrial power. The teachings of old were not adequate for those intending to join the work force straight from high school. They recognized that most of the boys graduating perused not college but mechanical or business jobs. It was not until the Civil War had ended and America had begun its Second Industrial Revolution that the Portland School Board realized that they needed to adapt the curricula of the high school boys.

It may be well to notice here the evident partiality shown in favor of “college boys”. Teachers are employed whose qualifications entitle them to our highest salaries, and these give no little time exclusively to the boys who are preparing for college. This is well; this is as it should be: but the boy who does not choose to go to college, and the boy whose father cannot afford to send him to college, – these also are entitled to as much of special instruction, of one kind or another, as are the comparatively few who seek to become “professional men.”

Their solution to the lack of classes for boys not attending college was to add drawing classes to the curriculum. The School Board reasoned a drawing class would be of great help in many areas of study, including mechanics, architecture, and engineering. “One may easily express his ideas on paper if they were good at drawing” This was not successful. Students continued to drop out of school around the second and third years of high school. Again, the problem of young men dropping out of high school was raised, this time in the 1878 Portland School Board Report. French studies, required for both the classical and general degrees, were causing many young men to perform poorly, become discouraged in their studies, and leave school.

By 1883, the citizens of Portland were calling for a change in the High School curriculum. The taxpayers claimed it was unfair to tax the entire populace for children to attend the classical studies program, which prepared them for college. They felt the taxpayers should not have to pay for a department utilized by so few young men. The citizens of Portland reasoned that private schools were better equipped to educate college bound boys. The Portland School Board felt the community did not understand the importance of education and its application later in life.

While the men of the School Board told those not headed for college not tailor their school career to fit their intended profession post-school, college bound boys, however, were told the opposite. In fact, they even went as far as to add it to the updated rules and regulations posted in 1883. ” Pupils who intend to try to enter Harvard College must give notice at the end of the second year of their school life to insure a proper fit.”

1897 was the year the School Board decided to catch up to the times. Some five hundred thousand people had immigrated to America between 1881 and 1893 and more were coming each day. Textile, shipping, and other industries were on the rise. America’s Second Industrial Revolution was forging the nation into an industrial power of the world. The Portland School Board could no longer ignore the voice of the Portland people. The School Board recognized that students needed to plan their studies according to their intended careers after high school. They decreed that a new manual training school for boys would be built at the intersection of Casco St. and Cumberland Ave. Practical physical sciences would be taught including: steam, electricity, telegraph, telephone, and the electric car.

The high school education of girls, however, lagged behind that of the boys for some time. Though the first boy’s high school began in 1821 , the girls did not receive a public high school until 1850. The Seneca Falls Convention had been held two years earlier in 1848. At Seneca Falls, New York on July 14, 300 men and women convened to discus abolition as well as women’s rights. Here the women produced the Declaration of Sentiments, which declared, “…We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men and women are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights governments are instituted, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”

This sentiment spread throughout New England as well. The public want for allowance of girls into public education grew great. The School Board agreed that a Girls High School was now needed.

Such a school, in the opinion of the Committee, has been long needed as a matter of simple justice to the female part of our growing population, who would seem to have the same claim upon the higher educational advantages provided by the city, as the male…It must be a matter alike of pride and gratitude with every intelligent citizen, that we have in force among us a system of public education which offers alike to all – to the rich and poor, to the humblest as well as the most gifted capacity – the means of a thorough education, in all the elementary branches of both English and classical study. A High School for Boys has long been established, and we think it not too early, or at all unreasonable, to ask now for a similar institution for girls.

The Board added a clause allowing girls to pursue a public high school education. They “would seem to have the same claim…as males.” This was a risky experiment for the School Board. Though education of girls was “known and warmly cherished” throughout large New England communities, there were some in Portland that did not welcome public education for girls.

From the first there had been, on the part of the larger tax paying citizens, who were able to send their children to the academy or to private schools of a high grade, a strong opposition to the establishment of a public high school.

Wealthy young women had greater opportunities for education then girls without money. The wealthy could afford many of the already existing private schools in the Portland area. One of these schools was Miss Martin’s School, a three-story mansion on India St. English, French, music, painting, “fancy work”, lace-making, filigree, geography, respect for elders, courtesy to all, graceful manners, and “lady-like” behavior was taught. Another private girl’s school, Miss Mayo’s School was “celebrated for their skill in exquisite needle-work” . Edward Elwell makes special note that “some of the ladies of our day have to thank [Miss Paine’s school] for an erect figure and the correct use of language” Learning social graces at these private schools would allow the girls to marry rich husbands, for she would bare children and host lavish parties.

The School Board sought to make public education for girls similar to that of boys, including Algebra, English, Chemistry, Rhetoric, Latin, Botany, Geometry, and Astronomy. The Girls High School would not be a place catering to those “fancy studies”, nor would it follow “the mere accomplishments of a fashionable education” Mr. Moses Woolson, the Girl’s High School head master, saw too it this would not be so.

The girls were schooled in a wide variety of studies. Math (Algebra, Geometry, Analytical Geometry, Navigation and Trigonometry), Latin, Science, History, Rhetoric, and reading were taught. Field trips were also taken. The botany of Portland was well documented by the girls of Mr. Woolson’s school. Portland Co. (to see the workings of a steam engine) and Cumberland Mills (paper making machinery) were also visited. Woolson’s school was a pioneer in these areas. They were including knowledge of machinery, long before they boys, who would actually be filling these positions, would be taught of machinery.

Many of these subjects were taught at a college level. Individual thoughts were encouraged. When drawing geometry examples on the board, girls were not allowed to duplicate those found in their texts. Current events discussions were a favorite of Mr. Woolson. “Mr Woolson was socially inclined and a great talker, and he no sooner grasped an idea or fact then he was restless till he could impart it. Girls would arrive early to talk the mornings news with him.” A visiting professor was so impressed with Woolson’s girls he stated, “those Portland girls were much keener than the dull-witted boys he had to teach.”

Woolson’s School was known for its great library. Mr. Woolson could be found at his school’s library nearly every Saturday. He encouraged his students to join him. The library contained many texts including, poetry, travel, histories, and “pure” literature”. Woolson did not allow popular novels such as those written by Dickens or Thackeray in the library and discouraged the girls from reading them. After the great fire of 1866, this library was the largest public library left in Portland.

Mr. Woolson kept his school, which became known as Woolson’s school, strict. He knew there were those ready to criticize on any failure from the girls including their ability to be punctual.

Latecomers went home, nor was it of the slightest use to plead that the clocks were wrong, that we had to do an errand, that we got to the steps before the first stroke, or that we couldn’t get across Congress Street because of an Irish Funeral…

These strict policies were very successful. In 1863, there was perfect attendance of every single student.
Students at Mr. Woolson’s school were judged on their academic accomplishments, not their wealth or who their parents and relatives were. Classroom chores were shared between all the girls. These included sweeping, cleaning the desks, tending the fire, and the winter chores.

Once a girl went home without doing her part of the work and sent the “hired girl” to sweep the stairs. Oh dear, what “nuts” that was for Mr. Woolson! What a text for him! He laughed and preached and jeered till the girl would have swept the street from Congress to Cumberland to insure forgetfulness of her lazy and toplofty action.

A great deal was expected of the girls, they were not left to on their own with studies. Each student was given individual time with one of the teachers. If a girl had trouble with her studies, there were several options she could take, such as entering into a lower grade, taking fewer classes, or dropping out of school entirely. Dropping out of school altogether, however, was greatly discouraged. As long as one made an effort with her studies and attended school regularly, the teachers would offer a helping hand. Those who were careless, lazy, or unpunctual found things were made difficult for them. These students were given the option to reform their behavior or leave school.

When the Portland Boys HS and Woolson’s School facilities grew overcrowded in 1856, there was a call to build a school that would hold both the boys and the girls. This was a radical view for the time. Even Boston, “the Hub of the Universe”, did not yet accept that girls deserved the public educational opportunities afforded to males.
The building was completed in 1863, but the boys and girls were not actually co-educated, in fact, boys and girls were kept separated except for their recitations. They did not even enter the building from the same street; boys entered from Congress St while girls entered from Cumberland Ave. A wall separated the male from the female students. Principal AP Stone was the first to initiate a change in this partitioning. He labeled it “the wall of prejudice”. Stone remedied this prejudice by knocking a doorway into the wall. This symbolic gesture had a great impact on the impression of the co-education of both males and females.

The high school educational system in Nineteenth Century Portland Maine did not always follow the wants of the citizens of Portland. An education for boys not bound for college was not fully realized until the 1890s, when the Second Industrial Revolution made the need for this type of education to great to ignore. Girls were not given an education equal to boys until the 1850s, after the great women’s movements of the Quakers and Methodists, as well as others, had begun to take hold. The needs of society are what have brought direct change to our nations educational system and it is this that will continue to spur change on.

Sunday Editorial on Editorials

Sundays are editorial days. All the newspapers are brimming with words of praise and punishment on the last day of the weekend. I’ve decided that on Sundays I should specifically comment on the comments I read in the Sunday specials.

A local Portland, Maine columnist Bill Nemitz wrote an article on January 4th on the Bush Shoeing and Jamilla El-Shafei’s planned recreation in D.C. The Press Herald received a flood of letters chastising Nemitz for various parts of the article. One letter takes issue with the opinion Nemitz puts forth in his column.

“Nemitz approached the line that separates journalism from advocacy when he published the Web site that the woman is using to collect the shoes, and he crossed it when, in closing, he wrote “come Jan. 20, we’d all best get over it.” The message I got was, “But let’s pile it on until then and here is where you can help!”

Bill Nemitz writes an opinion column. Nemitz agree with El-Shafei’s shoe tossing protest. That was his opinion. If he chooses to advocate a certain cause that is his choice. And it is your choice to disagree with him, as I do. (Bush has been bashed enough. Let the man fade into obscurity already.) To clarify the difference between an editorial and news article for that particular letter writer I present some definitions:

ed⋅i⋅to⋅ri⋅al
–noun
1. an article in a newspaper or other periodical presenting the opinion of the publisher, editor, or editors.

news
–noun
2. the presentation of a report on recent or new events in a newspaper or other periodical or on radio or television.

The difference is quite clear.

Another writer takes issue with Nemitz’s opening lines.

“Nemitz talked about his sister who lives in Virginia and, “whenever she drives by one of those Civil War re-enactments so popular down her way, rolls down her window and bellows, ‘Get over it!’ “

There was a time when I would have agreed with Nemitz’s sister. I spent a large portion of my youth in ignorance. After reading Tony Horwitz’s excellent “Confederates in the Attic: Dispatches from the Unfinished Civil War” my opinion changed. Those of us in the North only have a passing interest in the Civil War. We forget that our Southern neighbors literally live with the history. Unlike us they are surrounded by the bloody battlefields on which the Union and Confederacy waged war. We should remember those five awful Aprils. The conflict shaped so much of our nation today and those re-enactors play their roles to remind what happened, not to change history. Nemitz’s sister would do well to remember that before she embarrasses herself by shouting any more ignorant words cowardly from a speeding car.

Welcome

Welcome to the Maine View. This is my first outing into the world of blogging. In the future you can expect a lot from me, including vastly more interesting posts. The mini ice ages that occur up here in Maine from every November to April (I wish I was exaggerating) leave us with a lot of time to think. So, it’s no wonder that I have become a man of many opinions. I’ve got views on everything from politics to policy, entertainment to eating. You may think I am a genius. You may think I am an idiot. As long as I get you talking, and keep you thinking, I’ll be happy.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.